![[Image: Gary Bellow]](../images/bellowsmsm.jpg)
![[Image: Albert M. Sacks]](../images/Sacks_1asm.jpg)
THE TECHNOLOGY VISIONS SEMINAR held on May 4 and 5, 2000 explored the ways in which technology can be harnessed to expand the availability of legal services and improve quality and efficient service delivery. Technology was chosen as the first area of exploration for the Bellow-Sacks project because it is an area that has seen rapid innovation within the last few years. It is also an area that has intellectually engaged the legal services community and one in which significant investments have been made.
Invited guests were (click each person's name for biographical information download here: MS Word Format):
| ~Project Fellows | ||
| Michael Hertz | Founder and President, Probono.net | |
| Bonnie Hough | Supervising attorney, Center For Families, Children, and the Courts in California | |
| Wayne Moore | Director, AARP's
Legal Services Network 
|
|
| ~Invited Participants (in alphabetical order) | ||
| Hon. Cynthia J. Cohen | Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court | |
| John Graecan | Process Improvement Attorney for the New Mexico AOC and Owner of a private court administration consultant practice | |
| Frank Broccolina | State Court Administrator for Maryland | |
| Randy Youells | Vice
President for Programs, Legal
Services Corporation |
|
| ~Harvard Law School Affiliates (in alphabetical order) | ||
| David Grossman | Senior Clinical Instructor and Managing Attorney of the Housing and Litigation Unit and Lecturer on Law | |
| Maureen E. McDonagh | Clinical Instructor in the Housing and Litigation Unit | |
| Cynthia Monteiro | Clinical Instructor in Family Law and Coordinator of the Family Mediation Project | |
| Alexander Rabb | Albert
M. Sacks Clinical Fellow, Hale
and Dorr Legal Services Center |
|
| Topics Included: | A
critical review of existing pro se innovations involving court
and legal aid collaborations An exploration of pro se and self-help as a mode of service delivery Brainstorming about the ways pro se and self-help programs can become an integral piece of an expanded legal aid delivery system |
|
|
|
||