Professor Einer R. Elhauge

Carroll and Milton Petrie Professor of Law

Director, The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics

Office:	Hauser 502
Assistant:	Sarah Grandfield 617/496-1670
Phone:	(617) 496-0860
Fax:	(617) 496-0861
Email:	elhauge@law.harvard.edu

Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy

---

Professor Elhauge is the faculty director of the new Petrie-Flom Center in Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethics. For news articles about the center, see these articles in the New York Times and Boston Globe. For more on the center, see the program homepage.

Academic Writings

Loyalty Discounts and Naked Exclusion (Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series. Paper 608, February, 2008)

Statutory Default Rules: How to Interpret Unclear Legislation (Harvard University Press 2008)

Harvard, Not Chicago: Which Antitrust School Drives Recent Supreme Court Decisions? (Competition Policy International, Volume 3, Number 2, Autumn 2007, pages 59-77)

Global Antitrust Law & Economics (Foundation Press 2007)

Global Competition Law & Economics (Hart Press 2007)

Can Health Law Become a Coherent Field of Law?
(Wakeforest Law Review, Volume 41, Number 2, Summer 2006, pages 365-390)

Sacrificing Corporate Profits in the Public Interest
(NYU Law Review, Volume 80, Number 3, June 2005, pages 733-869)

Defining Better Monopolization Standards
(Stanford Law Review, Volume 56, Number 2, November 2003, pages 253-344)

Why Above-Cost Price Cuts to Drive Out Entrants Are Not Predatory - And the Implications for Defining Costs and Market Power
(Yale Law Journal, Volume 112, No. 4, January 2003, pages 681-827)

Preference-Estimating Statutory Default Rules
(Columbia Law Review, Volume 102, No. 8, December 2002, pages 2027-2161)

Preference-Eliciting Statutory Default Rules
(Columbia Law Review, Volume 102, No. 8, December 2002, pages 2162-2290)

The Lessons of Florida 2000
(110 Policy Review 15-36, Dec 2001-Jan 2002)

What Term Limits Do That Ordinary Voting Cannot, CATO POLICY ANALYSIS, NO. 328 (DEC. 16, 1998)

The Limited Regulatory Potential of Medical Technology Assessment, 82 VA. L. REV. 1525 (1997)

Are Term Limits Undemocratic?, 64 U. CHIC. L. REV. 83 (1997)

Elhauge, Lott & Manning, How Term Limits Enhance the Expression Of Democratic Preferences, 5 SUPREME COURT ECON. REV. 59 (1997)

Allocating Health Care Morally
(82 California Law Review 1449, December 1994)

AREEDA, ELHAUGE & HOVENKAMP, VOL X, ANTITRUST LAW (Little, Brown 1996)

Toward a European Sale of Control Doctrine, 41 AM. J. COMP. LAW 627 (1993)

Bundy & Elhauge, Knowledge About Legal Sanctions, 92 MICH. L. REV. 261 (1993)

The Triggering Function of Sale of Control Doctrine, 59 U. CHIC. L. REV. 1465 (1992)

Making Sense of Antitrust Petitioning Immunity, 80 CALIF. L. REV. 1177 (1992)

Do Lawyers Improve the Adversary System? A General Theory of Litigation Advice and Its Regulation, 79 CALIF. L. REV. 313 (1991)

The Scope of Antitrust Process, 104 HARV. L. REV.668 (1991)

Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judicial Review?, 101 YALE L.J. 31 (1991)

Professional Writings

Antitrust Analysis of GPO Exclusionary Agreements
(Comments Regarding Hearings on Health Care and Competition Law and Policy - Statement for DOJ-FTC Hearing on GPO's - Sept. 26, 2003)

Amicus Brief in Partisan Gerrymandering Case Before Supreme Court
(Brief Amicus Curiae of Democratic Pennsylvania Voters Joann Erfer and Jeffrey B. Albert in Support of Apellants in Vieth v. Jubilirer)

The Exclusion of Competition for Hospital Sales Through Group Purchasing Organizations
(report to U.S. Senate)

Tunney Act Comments of Professor Einer Elhauge on the Proposed Settlement between the United States and Microsoft

Media Writings

"Coverage vs Coercion" The Huffington Post (March 3, 2008)

"Rewire This Circuit" The Wall Street Journal, A26 (Sept. 17, 2003)

"Soft on Microsoft," The Weekly Standard (March 25, 2002)

"Despite What the Critics Say, it Wasn't a Bag Job," Boston Globe (March 3, 2002)

"Florida 2000: Bush Wins Again!," Weekly Standard (November 26, 2001 )

"State Made The Right Call On Microsoft," The Hartford Courant (Nov. 9, 2001)

"States Should Seek More From Microsoft," San Francisco Chronicle (Nov. 6, 2001)

"A Smart Move on Microsoft," Boston Globe (Sept. 11, 2001)

"Competition Wins in Court," New York Times, (June 30, 2001)

"Bush v. Florida," New York Times, A31 (Nov. 20, 2000)

"Florida's Vote Wasn't 'Irregular,'" Wall Street Journal (Nov. 13, 2000)

"The New 'New Property'," San Francisco Chronicle (Nov. 6, 2000)

"The Real Problem with Independent Counsels," The Washington Times, A19 (Jun 30, 1999)

"Foul Smoke," The Washington Post, A15 (August 4, 1998)

"The Court Failed My Test," The Washington Times, A-19 (July 10, 1998)

"Microsoft Gets an Undeserved Break," The New York Times,A21 (June 29, 1998)

"Medi-Choice," The New Republic, 24 (November 13,1995)

"Term Limits: Voters Aren't Schizophrenic," Wall Street Journal, A-16 (March 14, 1995)