Professor Einer R. Elhauge

Petrie Professor of Law

---

Books

United States Antitrust Law & Economics
(2d ed. Foundation Press 2011)

Global Antitrust Law & Economics
(2d ed. Foundation Press 2011)

Global Competition Law & Economics
(2nd ed. Hart Press 2011)

The Fragmentation of U.S. Health Care -- Causes and Solutions
(Oxford University Press 2010)

Statutory Default Rules: How to Interpret Unclear Legislation
(Harvard University Press 2008)

AREEDA, ELHAUGE & HOVENKAMP, VOL X, ANTITRUST LAW
(Little, Brown 1996)

Articles

The Irrelevance of the Broccoli Argument against the Insurance Mandate
New England Journal of Medicine (Dec 21, 2011)

Anti-Competitive Exclusion and Market Division Through Loyalty Discounts
Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series. Paper 707, September 2011

Why the Google Books Settlement is Procompetitive
2(1) Journal Of Legal Analysis 1 (2010)

Why We Should Care about Health Care Fragmentation and How to Fix It,
in The Fragmentation of U.S. Health Care: Causes and Solutions 1
(Oxford University Press 2010)

The Failed Resurrection of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory
6(1) Competition Policy International 155 (Spring 2010)

Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory
123 Harvard Law Review 397 (2009)

Framing the Antitrust Issues in the Google Books Settlement
Global Competition Pol’y, (October 2009 Release 2)

Disgorgement as an Antitrust Remedy
76 Antitrust Law Journal 79 (2009)

How Loyalty Discounts Can Perversely Discourage Discounting
5 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 189 (2009)

Do Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking Lead to Systematically Excessive Royalties?
4 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 535 (2008)

How Should Competition Law Be Taught?
4(1) Competition Policy International 267 (Spring 2008)

Harvard, Not Chicago: Which Antitrust School Drives Recent Supreme Court Decisions?
3(2) Competition Policy International 59 (Autumn 2007)

Can Health Law Become a Coherent Field of Law?
41 Wake Forest L. Rev. 365 (2006)

Sacrificing Corporate Profits in the Public Interest
80 N.Y.U. Law Review 733 (2005)

Corporate Manager's Operational Discretion to Sacrifice Corporate Profits in the Public Interest,
in  Environmental Protection and the Social Responsibility of Firms 13-76 
(Bruce Hay, Robert Stavins, & Richard Vietor eds.,2005)

Defining Better Monopolization Standards
56 Stanford Law Review 253 (2003)

Why Above-Cost Price Cuts to Drive Out Entrants Are Not Predatory - And the Implications for Defining Costs and Market Power
112 Yale Law Journal 681 (2003)

Preference-Estimating Statutory Default Rules
102 Columbia Law Review 2027 (2002)

Preference-Eliciting Statutory Default Rules
102 Columbia Law Review 2162 (2002)

The Lessons of Florida 2000
110 Policy Review 15 (Dec 2001 -Jan 2002).

What Term Limits Do That Ordinary Voting Cannot,
Cato Policy Analysis, No. 328 (Dec. 16, 1998)

Are Term Limits Undemocratic?,
64 U. Chic. L. Rev. 83 (1997)

Elhauge, Lott & Manning, How Term Limits Enhance the Expression Of Democratic Preferences,
5 Supreme Court Econ. Rev. 59 (1997)

The Limited Regulatory Potential of Medical Technology Assessment,
82 Va. L. Rev. 1525 (1996)

Allocating Health Care Morally
82 Calif. L. Rev. 1449 (1994)

Toward a European Sale of Control Doctrine,
41 Am. J. Comp. Law 627 (1993)

Bundy & Elhauge, Knowledge About Legal Sanctions
92 Mich. L. Rev. 261 (1993)

The Triggering Function of Sale of Control Doctrine
59 U. Chic. L. Rev. 1465 (1992)

Making Sense of Antitrust Petitioning Immunity
80 Calif. L. Rev. 1177 (1992)

Bundy & Elhauge, Do Lawyers Improve the Adversary System? A General Theory of Litigation Advice and Its Regulation
79 Calif. L. Rev. 313 (1991)

The Scope of Antitrust Process
104 Harv. L. Rev. 667 (1991)

Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judicial Review?
101 Yale L.J. 31 (1991)

Professional Writings

Cert Petition in PSKS v Leegin
(Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit)

Antitrust Analysis of GPO Exclusionary Agreements
(Comments Regarding Hearings on Health Care and Competition Law and Policy - Statement for DOJ-FTC Hearing on GPO's - Sept. 26, 2003)

Amicus Brief in Partisan Gerrymandering Case Before Supreme Court
(Brief Amicus Curiae of Democratic Pennsylvania Voters Joann Erfer and Jeffrey B. Albert in Support of Apellants in Vieth v. Jubilirer)

The Exclusion of Competition for Hospital Sales Through Group Purchasing Organizations
(report to U.S. Senate)

Tunney Act Comments of Professor Einer Elhauge on the Proposed Settlement between the United States and Microsoft

Media Writings

"The Broccoli Test" New York Times (Nov. 16, 2011)

"Coverage vs Coercion" The Huffington Post (March 3, 2008)

"Rewire This Circuit" The Wall Street Journal, A26 (Sept. 17, 2003)

"Soft on Microsoft," The Weekly Standard (March 25, 2002)

"Despite What the Critics Say, it Wasn't a Bag Job," Boston Globe (March 3, 2002)

"Florida 2000: Bush Wins Again!," Weekly Standard (November 26, 2001 )

"State Made The Right Call On Microsoft," The Hartford Courant (Nov. 9, 2001)

"States Should Seek More From Microsoft," San Francisco Chronicle (Nov. 6, 2001)

"A Smart Move on Microsoft," Boston Globe (Sept. 11, 2001)

"Competition Wins in Court," New York Times, (June 30, 2001)

"Bush v. Florida," New York Times, A31 (Nov. 20, 2000)

"Florida's Vote Wasn't 'Irregular,'" Wall Street Journal (Nov. 13, 2000)

"The New 'New Property'," San Francisco Chronicle (Nov. 6, 2000)

"The Real Problem with Independent Counsels," The Washington Times, A19 (Jun 30, 1999)

"Foul Smoke," The Washington Post, A15 (August 4, 1998)

"The Court Failed My Test," The Washington Times, A-19 (July 10, 1998)

"Microsoft Gets an Undeserved Break," The New York Times,A21 (June 29, 1998)

"Medi-Choice," The New Republic, 24 (November 13,1995)

"Term Limits: Voters Aren't Schizophrenic," Wall Street Journal, A-16 (March 14, 1995)