The news content in this site has been moved and these pages will be retired. News content can now be found at

Seminar explores policies of the ICC’s first prosecutor

Luis Moreno-Ocampo and Martha Minow
Leah Fasten

[L-R] ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo, HLS Dean Martha Minow and Associate Clinical Professor Alex Whiting

This January, in a seminar taught by Dean Martha Minow and Associate Clinical Professor Alex Whiting, 15 students at Harvard Law School discussed the policies and strategies of the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court—with the man most directly connected to those policies, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the ICC’S first prosecutor.

Two-thirds of the way through his nine-year mandate, Moreno-Ocampo came to Cambridge from The Hague to participate in the seminar, in which students reviewed policies and proceedings of the first permanent, independent, international court set up to hear cases involving genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Discussion ranged from the court’s approach to gender crimes and charging policies, to the role of victims, and the power of what Minow called “the shadow”—outside actors who magnify the court’s impact.

In a presentation to the class, Helen Beasley ’11 described the prosecutor’s approach to charging as focused and selective, while taking into consideration the possibility of stopping ongoing conflicts.

Naira Der Kiureghian ’11, who interned last summer at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia during the trial of former Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, recalled how prosecutors struggled under the pressure to narrow their case. “I think they wanted to hold Karadzic accountable for everything he had done and didn’t want to leave out any pieces of the story.”

Beasley said the narrow approach to charging “is connected to the policy the ICC has adopted of not trying to write history.”

Minow commented that although there may be great pressure for courts like the ICTY and the ICC to write history, the criminal framework is only roughly appropriate to the task.

“It’s of course focused on the defendant,” she said, “connecting the defendant to specific harms, not telling the whole big story.” In fact, one critique of the Nuremberg Trials, she said, “was that they were boring, with too many documents and no room for the victims.” There was a desire for a trial that gives people a chance to tell the story. But maybe, said Minow, that’s not what should be expected from the trial process.

Moreno-Ocampo agreed and commented that although trials have a historical dimension, to bring charges, he needs sufficient evidence, and too often he just can’t get it within the necessary timeframe. “So if I am writing history, it is wrong history,” he said.

One student asked the prosecutor about the genocide charges he brought against the president of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir. Although the ICC pre-trial chamber in March of last year issued an arrest warrant for Bashir for crimes against humanity and war crimes, it declined to include genocide.

Whiting—former senior trial attorney at the ICTY—urged the class to consider the risk of not convicting. And why charge genocide at all, Minow asked, when you might be able to get Bashir on a lesser charge, the way Al Capone was convicted on tax evasion? “What’s wrong with that?” she probed.

Moreno-Ocampo insisted that charging genocide was a legal decision. “It’s not that we are writing history, but we are representing the evidence we have,” he asserted. Bashir, he said, is holding millions of refugees from specific ethnic groups in camps under genocidal conditions.

By the beginning of February, ICC judges seemed closer to agreeing with him, when the appeals chamber ordered the pretrial chamber to re-consider the genocide charges.

Among others who spoke to the class were Visiting Professor Catharine MacKinnon, who is advising the prosecutor’s office on gender issues, and the former U.N. Ambassador Richard Williamson, a former special envoy to Sudan under President Bush.

Larkin Reynolds ’10 called the seminar “a fantastic opportunity to delve into issues at a deep level.” Aminu Gamawa LL.M. ’10, a Nigerian lawyer focused on human rights, agreed. “The ICC is a great project that will help in stabilizing Africa and in bringing to an end the impunity enjoyed by leaders who used their offices to commit atrocities,” he said. “I see this as a way of learning how I can contribute to its success.”

- Emily Newburger

© 2015 The President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved.