 |
 |
Upcoming Events
Friday, November 2, 2012 |
Symposium: Insitutional fCOIs in Research Universities |
|
Agenda
Welcome
Glenn Cohen
The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School
Lawrence Lessig
Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University
Introduction and Overview
David Korn, M.D.
Harvard Medical School; Massachusetts General Hospital
Evolving Roles and Enduring Values of American Research Universities
Jonathan Cole
Columbia University
William Fisher
Harvard Law School
Ezekiel Emanuel
University of Pennsylvania
Institutional Conflicts of Interest in Practice, Part I
Derek Bok
Harvard University
Jonathan H. Marks
The Pennsylvania State University
Welcome
Martha Minow
Dean,
Harvard Law School
Institutional Conflicts of Interest in Practice, Part II
Claude Canizares
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Hunter Rawlings
Association of American Universities
Federal Perspectives on Institutional Financial Conflicts of Interest
Francis Collins
National Institutes of Health
Sally Rockey
National Institutes of Health
Julie Taitsman
Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services
Concluding Session
Charles Vest
National Academy of Engineering |
| _________________________ |
Recent Events
Friday and Saturday, May 18-19, 2012 |
PFC Annual Conference:
The Future of Human Subjects Research |
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently released an Advanced Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM), titled “Human Subjects Research Protections: Enhancing Protections for Research Subjects and Reducing Burden, Delay, and Ambiguity for Investigators,” which proposes to substantially amend the Common Rule for the first time in twenty years. This development, as well as attention by the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, suggests we are at a moment when the regulation of human subjects research is ripe for re‐thinking. This conference is meant to gather leading experts from the U.S. and across the globe to assist in that endeavor.
|
| _________________________ |
Thursday and Friday, April 19-20, 2012 |
The Harvard Global Health Institute Recent Conference – 7th Annual Program in Ethics and Health: Identified Lives vs. Statistical Lives – Ethics and Public Policy |
|
The Harvard Global Health Institute in collaboration with partner organizations including the Petrie-Flom Center convened a University-wide program focusing on how decision makers and the public tend to feel more strongly obligated to assist “identified” people at risk than to assist “statistical” ones, and the implications for public policy. To illustrate, when a group of Chilean miners were stranded following a 2010 mine accident, the rescue mission garnered worldwide support and millions of dollars, but the public had not felt a similar need to invest in mine safety measures that would have saved more statistical lives. The conference examined questions such as what factors trigger or explain this difference in attitude and behavior; how is it manifested when we think about global health problems, such as treatment and prevention (and “treatment as prevention”) for HIV/AIDS; does the law express such bias; is there any ethical justification for this bias, for example, as a matter of obligation toward each and every individual? Is it, alternatively, a moral error, rooted in well-known cognitive biases?
|
| _________________________ |
Ronald Dworkin (left) Professor of Philosophy & Frank Henry Sommer Professor of Law
New York University
Einer Elhauge (right)
Carroll & Milton Petrie Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
& Founding Faculty Director
Petrie-Flom Center
|
|
 |
 |
 |