|
Author(s)
|
Publication
|
| ABA |
AMERICAN
BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, ETHICAL
CONSIDERATION 4-1 (1980) |
| ABA |
AMERICAN
BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE DEFENSE FUNCTION
(2d ed. 1980) |
| R.
ALLEN |
STRUCTURING
JURY DECISIONMAKING IN CRIMINAL CASES: A UNIFIED CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH
TO EVIDENTIARY DEVICES, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 321, 338-353 (1980) |
| A.J.
AYER |
HUME'S
FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION, from
The Legacy of Hume, in Probability and Evidence
3-6 (1972) |
| J.
BENTHAM |
RATIONALE
OF JUDICIAL EVIDENCE, from The Works of Jeremy Bentham 473-479 (Browning
ed. 1842), as quoted in 8 Wigmore, Evidence §2291, pp.549-551 (McNaughton
rev. 1961) |
| BREWER |
SCIENTIFIC
EXPERT TESTIMONY AND INTELLECTUAL DUE PROCESS, 107 Yale Law Journal,
1535, 1673-1679 (1998) |
| E.
CLEARY |
PRESUMING
AND PLEADING: AN ESSAY ON JURISTIC IMMATURITY, 12 Stan. L. Rev. 5-14
(1959) THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW |
| L.J.
COHEN |
THE
PROBABLE AND THE PROVABLE 77-81 (1977) |
| DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS |
DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS, Op. 119 (March 15, 1983) |
| S.
ESTRICH |
Proving
Character and Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases, S. ESTRICH, REAL
RAPE, Pages 1-7, 42-56 (1987) |
| J.
FALKNOR |
THE
"HEAR-SAY" RULE AS A "SEE-DO" RULE: EVIDENCE OF
CONDUCT, 33 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 133-138 (1960) |
| E.
GREEN |
THE
COMPLETE COURTHOUSE, IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION DEVICES IN A DEMOCRATIC
SOCIETY, 44-51 (1985 Roscoe Pound ATLA Foundation, Washington, D.C.) |
| H.
HART & J. McNAUGHTON |
EVIDENCE
AND INFERENCE IN THE LAW, in Evidence and Inference 48, 50-51 (Lerner
ed. 1959) |
| G.
JAMES |
RELEVANCY,
PROBABILITY AND THE LAW, 29 Calif. L. Rev. 689 (1941)
|
| J.
LANGBEIN |
THE
GERMAN ADVANTAGE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE , University of Chicago L. Rev.
(Fall 1985) |
| J.
McKenna, J. Cecil & P. Coukos |
"Reference
Guide on Forensic DNA Evidence" in Reference Manual on Scientific
Evidence (Federal Judicial Center 1994) |
| E.
MORGAN |
HEARSAY
DANGERS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HEARSAY CONCEPT, 62 Harv. L. Rev.
177, 192-196 (1948) |
| D.
NANCE |
CONDITIONAL
RELEVANCE REINTERPRETED, 70 B.U.L. Rev. 447 (1990)
|
| C.
NESSON |
THE
EVIDENCE OR THE EVENT? ON JUDICIAL PROOF AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF
VERDICTS, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1357 (1985) |
| C.
NESSON |
RATIONALITY,
PRESUMPTIONS, AND JUDICIAL COMMENT: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR ALLEN,
94 Harv. L. Rev. 1574, 1576-1583 (1981) |
| C.
NESSON |
REASONABLE
DOUBT AND PERMISSIVE INFERENCES: THE VALUE OF COMPLEXITY, 92 Harv.
L. Rev. 1187, 1208-1213 (1979) |
| P.
NEUFELD & B. SCHECK |
BETTER
WAYS TO FIND THE GUILTY, New York Times, 6/6/2000
|
| NOTE |
THE
BASES OF EXPERT OPINION |
| NOTE |
THE
CONVERGENCE OF FACT AND OPINION |
| NOTE |
NEUTRAL
EXPERTS |
| NOTE |
THE
PROCEDURE OF ADMITTING EVIDENCE UNDER RULE 801 (d) (2) (E): Co-Conspirators'
Statements |
| NOTE |
THE
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF THE HEARSAY RULES, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1786,
1786-1807 (1980) |
| NOTE |
THE
TREASON TRIAL OF SIR WALTER RALEIGH |
| NOTE |
WHEN
CONDUCT PRESENTS HEARSAY PROBLEMS |
| J.
LANGBEIN |
THE
GERMAN ADVANTAGE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE, University of Chicago Law Review
(Fall, 1985 ) |
| R.
PARK |
,R.
PARK, McCORMICK ON EVIDENCE AND THE CONCEPT OF HEARSAY: A CRITICAL
ANALYSIS FOLLOWED BY SUGGESTIONS TO LAW TEACHERS, 65 Minn. L. Rev.
423 (1981) |
| B.
RUSSEL |
ON
INDUCTION, in The Problems
of Philosophy, 60-69 (1912) |
| D.
SHAVIRO |
STATISTICAL-PROBABILITY
EVIDENCE AND THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 530 (1989) |
| P.
TAGUE |
PERILS
OF THE RULEMAKING PROCESS: THE DEVELOPMENT, APPLICATION, AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY
OF RULE 804(b)(3)'S PENAL INTEREST EXCEPTION, 69 Geo. L.J. 851, 862-863,
971 (1981) |
| J.
TANFORD & A. BOCCHINO |
RAPE
VICTIM SHIELD LAWS AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT, 128 U. Pa. L. Rev. 544,
544-549, 550-551 (1980) |
| J.
THAYER |
A
PRELIMINARY TREATISE ON EVIDENCE 266 (1898) |
| L.
TRIBE |
TRIANGULATING
HEARSAY, 87 Harv. L. Rev. 957, 957-961 (1974) |
| J.R.
TYBOR |
PERJURY
CASE GOES TO DOGS AFTER SHADOW CAST ON WITNESS, The National Law Journal,
Sept. 14, 1980, p.4 |
| G.
WILL |
DNA,
THE DEATH PENALTY AND HORRIFYING MISTAKES, The Washington Post 4/6/2000 |
