Plea Bargain

 

D was arrested on heroin distribution charges by DEA Agent A, who gave him Miranda warnings. D then informed A that he had cooperated with the government in the past and would be willing to do so in the future. In the course of this conversation D made incriminating statements relating to the crime for which he had been arrested. Later that day D met in a pre-arraignment conference with Assistant United States Attorney B and had a similar conversation. After his arraignment D returned to DEA headquarters with a lawyer to meet with A. D again offered to cooperate, and A suggested that D contact Agent C. D thereafter contacted C, offered to cooperate, and made some incriminatory statements. At no time during any of these conversations did D explicitly offer to plead guilty or request a concession from the government.

Which parts, if any, of the conversations related above should be excluded under Rule 410? What additional information might assist you in making this determination?



div1.gif (1531 bytes)
Home | Contents | Topical Index | Syllabi | Search | Contact Us | Professors' Pages
Cases | Problems | Rules | Statutes | Articles | Commentary