| |
Book Notes
The African Charter on Human and
Peoples Rights: The System in Practice, 19862000. Edited by
Malcolm Evans and Rachel Murray. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University
Press, 2002. Pp. 418. $75.00, paper.
In recent decades, the peoples of Africa have been hit hard by
natural disasters, civil war, ethnic and religious conflict, and widespread
human rights abuses. In order to support the healing and progress of the
continent, the Organization of African Unity (OAU) created the
African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, which entered into force in
1986. With the Charter, the OAU sought to bring human rights out of a
Western-dominated framework and ground it solidly in African values and
concerns. For instance, the Charter outlines the individuals duties
towards the state in addition to the states duties toward the individual,
reflecting African values of reciprocity and collaboration. Unfortunately, many
within and outside the *** Top of Page 308
***
region have been sorely disappointed by the enforcement of the
Charter under the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights (founded
by the OAU). They commonly complain that the Commission is overly deferential
to state governments, takes too long to process Communications (submissions of
human rights violations under the Charter), and overemphasizes the goal of
promoting dialogue while underemphasizing the importance of deterring human
rights abuses.
The African Charter on Human and Peoples Right
provides a constructive, no-frills critique of the Commissions
implementation of the Charter. The mission of the book is straightforward: to
evaluate the Charters efficacy in practice, not theory. To this end,
editors Malcolm Evans and Rachel Murray have assembled an impressive
international cast of eleven African human rights specialists from academia,
NGOs, international law bodies, and the Commission itself. They largely avoid
taking an adversarial, exposé-style approach, seeking instead to combat
pessimism about the African regional human rights system with realistic,
informed, critical optimism.
The book opens with a look forward in Future Trends in Human
Rights in Africa by Gino Naldi. At its inception in 1963, Naldi
explains, the OAU was more expressly concerned with bolstering state
sovereignty and ridding the continent of colonialisms traces than with
promoting and protecting human rights. The Charters entry into force,
Naldi argues, represented an important step forward for human rights in Africa.
He acknowledges weaknesses in the Charter as it was written, such as
clawback clauses that appear to subject individual civil and
political rights to the dictates of state law. However, Naldi refuses to regard
the Charter as fatally flawed. Instead, he highlights recent
efforts of the OAU to give the Commission more bite and to zero in on the
issues of greatest concern to Africa, such as discrimination against women and
the persecution of those living with HIV/AIDS. Ultimately, Naldi is guardedly
hopeful about the potential of the system to become an effective regional human
rights instrument.
The next section takes the reader through the failures and
successes of the Commission in its nitty-gritty, day-to-day operations. Writing
on the states reporting mechanism, Malcolm Evans, Tokunbo Ige, and Rachel
Murray document the widespread lack of compliance with the Charters
bi-annual-state-reporting requirement. They recommend greater forcefulness on
the part of the Commission in obtaining and responding to state reports. On the
Commissions rulings on admissibility, Frans Viljoen applauds the
Charters unique procedural flexibility, such as its acceptance of
Communications from non-victims. Viljoen criticizes the Commission, however,
for applying too strict a standard in barring Communications. On the
Commissions evidence and fact-finding, Murray makes a strong case for the
Commission to step out of its role as promoter of OAU solidarity and to take
its role as finder and trier of fact more seriously. According to Murray, the
Commission must strengthen its credibility by vigorously enforcing evidentiary
standards for states and using country missions to conduct more thorough
investigations *** Top of Page 309 ***
of abuses. The theme resounding throughout this section is the
need for greater political will and consistency in the Commissions
procedures.
The book also touches on more theoretical, ideological issues of
the Charters enforcement. Articles by Christof Heyns and Chidi Anselm
Odinkalu examine the normative framework that the Charter creates for the
treatment of distinct categories of rights: civil, political, economic, social,
and cultural. One of the books highlights also appears in this section:
The Challenge of Culture for Human Rights in Africa: The African Charter
in a Comparative Context, by N. Barney Pityana, a current member
of the Commission. In Pityanas view, universality and cultural relativism
need not exist as two opposing poles of approaches to human rights, where
neer the twain shall meet. Pityana commends the OAUs intention of
centering its human rights approach on African culture and traditions but
rejects the OAUs interpretation of universal human rights as a
Westernized, neocolonial proposition. The appropriate balance, according to
Pityana, is to incorporate both approaches and apply universal human rights
principles contextually, protecting individual rights liberally but with an eye
toward local values and priorities.
Finally, the books authors highlight the roles of different
players in the African regional human rights system: NGOs (Ahmed Motala),
Special Rapporteurs (Malcolm Evans and Rachel Murray), the imminent African
Court on Human and Peoples Rights (Julia Harrington), and the Commission
itself (Victor Dankwa). The writers in this section unflinchingly reveal the
stitches holding the African regional system together and the lack of political
will on the part of the Commission and of states that is weakening its
authority. Still, each concludes by looking toward possibilities for
strengthening the framework. According to these well-informed participants and
observers, the Commission needs to promote broader awareness of the Charter
across the continent, greater access for individuals to its mechanisms, and
more courageous collaboration with states and NGOs alike.
This book is a valuable and unique contribution to scholarship
about human rights in Africa. It would have strongest appeal to human rights
practitioners and academics with an interest in Africa or comparative
international human rights studies. Although it may not make for particularly
vivid reading, the books clarity and conviction also make it an engaging
and worthwhile experience for readers with a less single-minded interest in the
African region.
Monica Eav
Copyright © 2003 by the President
and Fellows of Harvard College Harvard Human Rights Journal / Vol. 16,
Spring 2003 |
|