OUTLINE — DISCUSSION 1
(For a more “printer-friendly” version of this outline (pdf) click here.)
Paul’s Letter to the Romans Paul of Tarsus was an observant Jew, who was not one of Jesus’ followers
during the latter’s life. He violently opposed the early Christians,
participating in efforts to suppress them. He experienced a conversion and
became as ardent a Christian as he had earlier been an opponent of
Christianity. He felt that he was called to a special mission to be the
apostle of the Gentiles, to convert non-Jews to Christianity. He went on
three missionary journeys, preaching and founding churches in The letter to the Romans is perhaps the most theological of Paul’s
letters, certainly among the most polished. Its great theme is the
relationship between Judaism and Christianity. Its immediate occasion may
have been the problem of the mixed church in The argument of the letter: The anger of God against both pagans and Jews. Why God is angry against the Jews is easy. They have the Law but they do not keep it, 2:21–2 (bottom of p. 13 of the Materials): “You preach against stealing, yet you steal; you forbid adultery, yet you commit adultery; you despise idols, yet you rob their temples.” Why God is angry against the pagans is more complicated, 2:14–15: “Pagans who never heard of the law but are led by reason to do what the law commands, may not actually ‘possess’ the law but they can be said to ‘be’ the law. They can point to the substance of the law engraved on their hearts—they can call a witness, that is, their own conscience—they have accusation and defense, that is, their own inner mental dialogue.” But where are we to find this law, in the Torah? Yes, of course, but also (and this is the first big move in the letter): The relationship of faith and law. 3:21: “God’s justice that was made known through the Law and the Prophets has now been revealed outside the Law ... to everyone who believes in Jesus Christ. ... [3:31] do we mean that faith makes the Law pointless? Not at all: we are giving the Law its true value.” But that might suggest that the Law is still in force. 7:1: “Brothers, those of you who have studied law will know that laws affect a person only during his lifetime. A married woman, for instance, has legal obligations to her husband while he is alive, but all these obligations come to an end if the husband dies. ... That is why you, my brothers, who through the body of Christ are now dead to the Law, can now give yourself to another husband, to him who rose from the dead to make us productive for God. ... The reason [8:1] therefore why those who are in Christ Jesus are not condemned, it that the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death. God has done what the Law, because of our unspiritual nature was unable to do.” But what is now law? A new law for a new covenant. 13:8–9: “Avoid getting into debt except the debt of mutual love. If you love your fellow men you have carried out your obligations. All the commandments ... are summed up in this single command: You must love your neighbor as yourself.” 13:1: “You must obey the governing authorities. Since all government comes from God, the civil authorities were appointed by God, and so anyone who resists authority is rebelling against God’s decision ... . The state is there to serve God for your benefit. If you break the law, however, you may well have fear; the bearing of the sword has its own significance. The authorities . . . carry out God’s revenge by punishing wrongdoers ... . This is also the reason why you must pay taxes since all government officials are God’s officers ... .” Some themes.
Some key dates in the legal history of Christianity: 30? — Crucifixion of Jesus 67 — Traditional death of SS. Peter and Paul 70 — First Roman destruction of c.96 — Letter of Pope Clement I to the Corinthians c.100 — approximate date of the last canonical books of the New Testament (though some of the epistles, e.g., 2 Peter, are almost certainly later) 132–35 — Bar Cocheba revolt (second Roman destruction of mid-2d century — Beginnings of the tradition of pseudo-apostolic canons known as the didache (teaching) 2d century — Scattered papal letters concerning heresy and discipline c.200 — Redaction of the Mishna at Jamnia 3d century — Continues papal letters concerning heresy and discipline 3d century — Earliest known local councils or synods (deal with Easter date, baptism conferred by heretics, those lapsed during persecutions, bishops suspected of heresy or irregularly promoted) 312 — Edict of 325 — Council of Nicea (condemns Arius: Christ ‘of same substance’ as God the Father; disciplinary canons) 366–384, 384–399 — ‘Decretal’ letters of Popes Damasus and Siricius 381 — Council of 431 — Council of 440–61 — Decretal letters of Pope Leo the Great 451 — Council of 4th & 5th centuries — Many Western local councils (Rome, Gaul, Spain, Africa) promulgate canons on an ever-wider range of topics c.500 — Redaction of the Talmud (in |
A ROMP THROUGH THE EARLY LEGAL HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY
|
|
[Home Page] [Syllabus] [Lectures] [Information and Announcements] URL: http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/CLH/clhfas/lectures/outd01.html Copyright © 2011 Charles Donahue, Jr.
|